The marches attack Port Sudan for the second time and the army commander reveals the UAE’s use of naval bases to launch the attack

Follow-up- Al-Zawiya Net- The strategic marches for the second time attacked the city of Port Sudan and Kasla, by targeting fuel depots.

Lieutenant -General Mahjoub Bushra, Commander of the Red Sea Military Region, revealed that the UAE used naval military bases to strike the city of Port Sudan.

The team, Bushra, said during an official enlightenment of the diplomatic missions in the city of Port Sudan, that the technical and intelligence data that were analyzed after the planes were shot down clearly indicating that the engines came from the east, that is, from the direction of the Red Sea, and not from land in the west.

He explained that this “opens the door wide for the possibility of the attack from an Emirati military bases in the separation areas of Somalia, such as Puntland or Somalia.”

He added: “These rules are known for their use in transferring mercenaries to the occupied airports of Nyala, Umm Jars, and Amplina, and Abu Dhabi has already used them in similar operations,” noting that “the UAE has advanced logistical and military capabilities that qualify it to launch accurate naval attacks targeting the Sudanese depth from outside the border.”

The military commander explained that “the attack was not random or direct, but was characterized by a intermittent and coordinated nature, aimed at distracting the land defenses,” stressing that “the first suicide bombers were aimed at only to occupy the air defense systems, in preparation for the arrival of a strategic strategic arrival targeting the radars of the rulers of Flamingo and Othman Digna.”

Bushra continued, “This method of implementation shows the efficiency of the air defense system in Port Sudan, and at the same time it shows that the aggressor is fully aware of our strengths and capabilities, and is fluent in planning a complex and multi -axes attack to overcome it.”

The team, Bushra, pointed out that this type of attack confirms that there is no doubt that Sudan is facing an organized regional aggression, and not just an internal conflict or a militia rebellion. In a decisive tone, he said: “What we are exposed to an external aggression led by the artificial enemy state in Abu Dhabi, using modern and costly military tools to strike Sudanese strategic sites.”

He warned against negligence in describing what is happening, saying: “Ignore this fact or collusion in its negation can only be explained that the person is invalid or stupid … or a customer.”