A member of the Sudan delegation in the International Court

Dialogue- Mohamed Gamal Kandoul- The International Court of Justice rejected the “Sudan” lawsuit filed against the “Emirates” for its support for the Al-Daklu terrorist militia.

The reasons for rejection and the upcoming steps from the government of Sudan regarding the confrontation of the evil of evil, have remained one of the important questions that wandered in the popular and media circles.

(Al -Karama) To answer these questions, a member of the Legal Committee for International Claims at the Ministry of Justice, Mawlana Mutasim Al -Senussi, has regretted his answers.

How do you see the refusal of the lawsuit by the International Court of Justice?

The lawsuit in a formal point of view, according to the reservation submitted by the UAE, refused the agreement to prevent genocide to punish it.

What are the reasons for rejecting the lawsuit?

We do not see that there is a failure. What was rejected by the lawsuit is formally, as the court was not originally fought in the subject of the dispute.

There is no failure.

Does the decision mean that the issue of Sudan was lost before the court, or lost temporary measures?

As for the crime of genocide, the case has been made because it was removed from the court records. But that does not mean that Sudan does not have an issue.

There are other agreements between Sudan and the UAE that contain the same issues that Sudan accuses the UAE of violating.

Is there a default in the form of the lawsuit? Is Article 9 a loophole in Sudan’s complaint, especially since the UAE is not signed on the genocide agreement?

It is signed on the agreement and this is not considered a loophole, and there is a feasibility study that was prepared before the case was filed by national and foreign experts. The study ended for the possibility of accepting the complaint with the possibility of rejecting it in almost equal proportions, similar to other claims filed against countries presented to objection and preservation and was accepted, including the issue of “Bosnia and Herzegovina” against the State of Serbia.

Will the upcoming suits include the “engines” targeting vital facilities by the militia and directly supporting the Emirates?

Yes .. lawsuits can be filed in this regard, because this represents an aggression against the state of Sudan.

What are the options of the government of Sudan after refusing the lawsuit?

Rejection of the lawsuit just because the UAE’s reservation does not mean that the case cannot be submitted again before the court according to other signed agreements that the two countries are considered a party. It contains texts that talk about preventing countries by interfering in the affairs of other countries, and not interfering with support, and so on in any wars or conflicts.

Not the Court of Justice, are there other options?

Yes .. a lawsuit can be filed again before the same court, in addition to the presence of other courts such as: the courts of some European Union countries related to the crimes of international genocide, in addition to the International Criminal Court, and there are now lawsuits filed in the criminal against Mohammed bin Zayed and the rest of the leaders of the militia rapid support from the first row.

Have the UAE used illegal influence or methods to write off the preacher?

This is an issue that cannot be claimed. However, our evidence that our cause is strong that the 7 judges represent the great powers in the world, who are from America, Australia, Germany, South Africa, India, Mexico and Somalia.

Are there alternative plans that have been developed if the lawsuit was rejected?

Yes .. there are plans and now under study and will be resolved and raised to the competent authorities soon.