With documents .. revealing documents related to “steadfastness”

Follow-up- Al-Zawiya Net- The Chadian investigator revealed that he obtained the “plot threads”, which is an original copy of an official letter sent by the “Samoud” coalition to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in which his special envoy to Sudan, Ramadan Al-Amamra, complains of him, accusing him of not providing what she described as “the required support” for their agenda.

When analyzing the content of the discourse and comparing it with the paths of international action on Sudan, it turns out that Qaht does not act as an independent Sudanese political party, but rather as a body directly connected to the decision -making circles in Western capitals, and deals with the UN envoy as an executive tool, not as a neutral representative of the United Nations.

The speech as an intelligence pressure tool: The content of the message shows discontent that the envoy Ramadan Al -Amamra did not show sufficient response to their endeavor to re -impose the formula of civil rule according to their partisan conditions, which reveals their endeavor to employ the international organization as a pressure tool for political empowerment.

Requesting the change of the envoy = explicit communication: their explicit demand to change the envoy on the pretext of “not serving it for their agenda” is a dangerous precedent that reveals an disturbing mentality that works to direct the paths of the international action to serve one party inside Sudan, at the expense of other components, and even at the expense of national sovereignty.

Qat turned into an external tool: Through this discourse, it shows itself as a party that does not work from inside the Sudanese house, but rather directly relates abroad, and explicitly requests to reshape the United Nations mission according to its partisan sizes. This is a dangerous slide from the “opposition” to the website of the foreign political agency.

UN collusion and double standards: the continued ignorance of the United Nations of this type of behavior by Qath indicates the possibility of unannounced collusion from within the UN mission itself, or at least a deliberate failure in the face of parties to practicing political communication, under the umbrella of civil legitimacy.

I have no longer practicing any internal national role, but rather a direct intelligence threat to Sudan by summoning the outside, and directing political complaints towards international organizations instead of engaging in any comprehensive national project.

The sending discourse is considered an indirectly communicating document, and is criminalized under any national law that raises sovereignty and prevents the foreigner.

This behavior restores to the minds of the sabotage role that some opposition forces played in other countries, as they were used as a bridge to cross the projects of division, fragmentation and undermining the sovereignty of states.