Omar Al -Daqir writes .. d. Amin Hassan Omar: The falsity of the narrative and the disability of the speech

I remember that, in a television debate with the Proof of Ibrahim Ghandour, I described the discourse of the National Congress and its Islamic movement as applying to him the hadith of the poem “cloud in pants”, Vladimir Mayakovsky, on “the speech that loses his cohesion and suitability, so the words come out of the mouth of its owner as if they were naked people who flee from Hammam burning” – Amin Hassan Omar, in his recent dialogue with “Al -Jazeera Mubasher ..

As if the war they lit – and has recovered a lot from their influence that the revolution dropped – gave them another opportunity to reproduce the illusions of their ancient power and claim the monopoly of the meaning of the country and patriotism, so he issued his peremptory rule over those who referred to them by individuals who represent what was known as “progress” and now known as “steadfastness”, that they have no repentance or a dignity because they “represent this back, which is the militia.”

The essence of Amin Hassan Omar’s speech is the same speech by the rest of Rahata, including his party colleague and his Islamic movement, Mrs. Sana Hamad, who appeared through the same channel, “Al -Jazeera Mubasher”, to announce with a desirable tongue: “We are obligated to sit and dialogue with rapid support if a misdemeanor of peace.”

But she stressed in return the impossibility of dialogue with “progress”, because – as she claimed – “granted legitimacy and acceptable to the Rapid Support Forces to move in this hideous war,” as if it was “progress” that established these forces and codified their existence by a decision of Parliament, not the regime that was and a secretary of his leadership! .. In that dialogue, Sanaa did not forget to send a thin blame to the Rapid Support Leader: “You are not the man we knew!”

And when they rely on a narrative claiming that the democratic civil powers and the political cover of rapid support to commit crimes and violations, the paradox that their pens and satellite channels are used to attack these forces more than they are harnessed to attack the rapid support itself … Perhaps in this what indicates their true intentions: they are in this position that may smoke a reserve for the requirements of leveling with rapid support, with rapid support. If I was pleased with them, as they did before that with the popular movement, which raised the flags of treachery and employment and declared jihad, then they ended with it into a peace that divided the country … and “what is the day of Halima with a distance”, if the collective national mind did not remedy it.

As for the reason for their blatant hostility to the democratic civil forces, because it was and is still at the forefront of resisting their authoritarian project, and from the ranks of the revolution that uprooted their biting tree, those they thought were the tree of the mole and a symbol of an unimaginable king. Therefore, the subject of their primary war is the glorious revolution of December and its humanitarian motives and the goals it represents.

Perhaps the clearest revealing the falsehood of this narrative and exposes the emptiness of the discourse that he promotes is his inability to face the truth when he is besieged with simple and direct questions, as happened with Dr. Amin, when the broadcaster asked him: “Is your judgment not repentance applied to the previous regime that killed thousands in Darfur?” .. So he escaped saying: “This is a point of view and not a question.” When he re -asked him in another form: “Who killed thousands in Darfur?”, It seemed as if he had been faded, and he did not find any of the deeds with denial and dodging: “There was no party that killed thousands.

There was a rebellion, and there was the army and friendly forces fighting with different views. ”Here, Amin forgot, or forgot, the memory of the archive that reserved for its president, Omar Al -Bashir, famous statements made during a Ramadan table – called by the head of the regional authority of Darfur on July 22, 2013 – he expressed regret, and acknowledged the negligence in the tolerance of the people of Darfur and the shedding of their blood for the most trivial reasons.

Whatever the case, this war will stop with the dominant will of the Sudanese .. The people are always smarter than being a narrative of a lie or a speech that is permanently, and stronger than surrendering to tyranny or subject to the reality of the devastating war, and therefore the whole history was not a long night of oppression, killing and destruction, but the will of life and freedom – the sacrifices of the people – triumphed.

Despite the campaigns of treachery and misleading that forcibly removes positions and opinions from its contexts, it did not eliminate our insights or our eyes, and in our hearts only the love of goodness for all Sudanese and their security their salvation from the catastrophe of the war .. We do not carry any feelings of hatred for Mr. Amin and his group, but we will not call from calling for the promotion of the broader political and social stream to confront the war of the war that calls for the continuation of the war. And his defeat, a stream that works for a peaceful political solution that preserves the unity of the country, collects the will of its people, and opens the way for a national consensus to a new establishment .. What the Sudanese made most of the freedoms made by it is to result in a new homeland that all can help them with the conditions of a decent life, without discrimination or exclusion.