A direct confrontation between Sudan and the UAE

Follow-up- Al-Zawiya Net- Sudan’s permanent representative in Geneva, Ambassador Hassan Hamed Hassan, attacked the representative of the United Arab Emirates in three consecutive interventions during the high meeting on conflicts and international humanitarian law.

This came against the background of that the UAE representative indicated in his statement to his country’s contributions to supporting international organizations to implement the humanitarian response to the humanitarian situation in Sudan, trying to deny his country’s involvement in supporting the rebel militia.

The permanent representative of the Sudan affirmed that the principles and alphabets of humanitarian work are based on complete neutrality, but rather absolute neutrality, and that those who are involved in supporting the rebel militia with weapons, military equipment and mercenaries cannot in any case to present himself as a human actor in such a high platform, and that whoever supports and supports the rebel militia with weapons The developed, including strategic enlightens to strike service and strategic civil facilities in Sudan, cannot provide himself as a supporter of humanitarian action, but rather must be held full responsibility and considering it as an authentic partner in these crimes

He added that the involvement of the UAE in supporting, adopting and caring for the rebel militia in Sudan is no longer a subject of disagreement or denial, but rather is never different around it, adding that, given that the time devoted to response is not expanded, it indicates – for example, but not limited to the following:

First: The report of the Security Council experts team established by Council Resolution 1591, which is deposited with the Security Council on January 15, 2024, saying, “This report has been circulated as an official document of the United Nations documents that we all all command now.

Second: The reports of the major international organizations that confirmed the involvement of the Emirates, the most recent of which is the report supported by the irrefutable evidence issued by the Amnesty International. With the smooth and deposited evidence of the Security Council.

Third: The respect of international humanitarian law requires – in the first place – the neutrality and respect of the United Nations Charter and the established principles in it regarding the sovereignty of states and not to interfere in their internal affairs, not to mention the involvement in supporting and adopting a rebel militia that practices terrorism in its most heinous pictures, and targets the state and the people.

The UAE delegate tried to respond to the representative of Sudan, claiming that his country did not support any party, and the exaggerations that his country donated to humanitarian organizations, and then the permanent delegate passed the right to respond again to the UAE delegate, saying, “Hold your money, so the people of Sudan are more generous than that, indicating that the hands that offer arms Strategic enlightenings to strike the Sudanese people and strike their civilian facilities cannot participate in such a platform to claim to provide humanitarian support.

As for the allegations of the UAE delegate about his country’s innocence, the permanent delegate confirmed that there is no single report that has acquitted the UAE, and even the procedural issue they cling to regarding the International Court of Justice, this is the particular drowning in the accused accusations, which makes them cling to a non -feasible straw, because the International Court of Justice did not absolve the UAE, but it was reported that the complaint has reported It is not within its jurisdiction, and this is a miserable attempt by a drowning of accusations that try to cling to the straw and this is not useful.